ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
Recurrent Neural Networks to Automatically Identify Rare Disease Epidemiologic Studies from PubMed.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectrum of Genetic Diseases in Tunisia: Current Situation and Main Milestones Achieved.Genes · 2021Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of Natural History Studies in Rare Diseases: A Step toward Understanding Disease Development and Outcome.Journal of rare diseases (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Precision information extraction for rare disease epidemiology at scale.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases affect between 25 and 30 million people in the United States, and understanding their epidemiology is critical to focusing research efforts. However, little is known about the prevalence of many rare diseases. Given a lack of automated tools, current methods to identify and collect epidemiological data are managed through manual curation. To accelerate this process systematically, we developed a novel predictive model to programmatically identify epidemiologic studies on rare diseases from PubMed. A long short-term memory recurrent neural network was developed to predict whether a PubMed abstract represents an epidemiologic study. Our model performed well on our validation set (precision = 0.846, recall = 0.937, AUC = 0.967), and obtained satisfying results on the test set. This model thus shows promise to accelerate the pace of epidemiologic data curation in rare diseases and could be extended for use in other types of studies and in other disease domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34457147PMC8378621W3197014505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.