Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457041›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for bladder cancer: a comprehensive systematic review of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) performance and potential clinical applications.

Denis Séguier, Philippe Puech, Ronald Kool, Léa Dernis, Héléna Gabert, Wassim Kassouf, Arnauld Villers, Gautier Marcq

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Is high accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) sufficient for its implementation in the urological practice?Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denis SéguierUrology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France.
Philippe PuechUniv. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Department of Radiology, U1189 - ONCO-THAI - Image Assisted Laser Therapy for Oncology, Lille, France.
Ronald KoolDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-6456
Léa DernisDepartment of Radiology, U1189 - ONCO-THAI - Image Assisted Laser Therapy for Oncology, Lille, France.
Héléna GabertUrology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France.
Wassim KassoufDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arnauld VillersUrology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France.
Gautier MarcqLille University, School of Medicine, Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHRU Lille, LILLE Cedex, France Researcher - PhD Candidate, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-1448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score is a novel standardized approach to image and report bladder cancer (BC) with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).

objectivesTo describe and evaluate the performance of the VI-RADS score using mpMRI and assess its potential clinical applications and limitations.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic bibliographic databases between June 2020 and December 2020. All reports deemed relevant to describe the VI-RADS score and assess its performance and applications were retrieved. Results presentation stands as narrative, purely descriptive synthesis based on aggregate studies data.

resultsA total of 20 relevant studies were retrieved: three meta-analyses, five prospective studies, and twelve retrospective studies. The retrospective studies covered 1676 patients, while the prospective studies included a total number of 468 patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity to differentiate muscle-invasive from non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, ranged from 74.1% to 97.3%, and 77% to 100%, respectively. The chosen VI-RADS score thresholds for this discrimination varied across studies. The interreader agreement ranged from 0.73 to 0.95. Currently, the potential clinical applications of VI-RADS consist of initial BC risk stratification, assessment of neoadjuvant therapies response, and bladder sparing approaches, although further validation is required.

conclusionsThe VI-RADS score helps to discriminate muscle invasive from non-muscle invasive BC with good performance and reproducibility. A simple algorithm based on four basic questions may enhance its popularization. Further studies are required to validate the clinical applications.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingmultimodal therapymultiparametricneoadjuvant therapystagingurinary bladder neoplasmsurinary bladder neoplasms/diagnosisurinary bladder neoplasms/diagnostic imaging

Identifiers

PMID34457041
PMCPMC8392809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.