Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456998›Full record

ReviewAdvances in urology2021

Dual-Tracer Positron-Emission Tomography Using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and Fluorodeoxyglucose for Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Stephen McGeorge, Michael Kwok, Andrew Jiang, Louise Emmett, David A Pattison, Paul A Thomas, John W Yaxley, Matthew J Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preclinical evaluation and first-in-human study ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Multitracer comparison of gold standard PSMA-PET/CT withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Comparison ofEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. FDG PET/CT - not PSMA trendy, but available, comfortable, and complementary.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen McGeorgeDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-0375
Michael KwokDepartment of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe 4020, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-5360
Andrew JiangFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Queensland, Australia.
Louise EmmettDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-7384
David A PattisonFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-5598
Paul A ThomasFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-0950
John W YaxleyDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-9037
Matthew J RobertsDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-7402
The University of Queensland · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PSMA PET is more accurate than conventional imaging (CT/bone scan) for staging of intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but 5-10% of primary tumours have low PSMA ligand uptake. FDG PET has been used to further define disease extent in end-stage castrate-resistant PCa and may be beneficial earlier in the disease course for more accurate staging. The objective of this study was to review the available evidence for patients undergoing both FDG and PSMA PET for PCa staging at initial diagnosis and in recurrent disease. A systematic literature review was performed for studies with direct, intraindividual comparison of PSMA and FDG PET for staging of PCa. Assessment for radioligand therapy eligibility was not considered. Risk of bias was assessed. 543 citations were screened and assessed. 13 case reports, three retrospective studies, and one prospective study were included. FDG after PSMA PET improved the detection of metastases from 65% to 73% in high-risk early castration-resistant PCa with negative conventional imaging (M0). Positive FDG PET was found in 17% of men with negative PSMA PET for postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence. Gleason score ≥8 and higher PSA levels predicted FDG-avid metastases in BCR and primary staging. Variant histology (ductal and neuroendocrine) was common in case reports, resulting in PSMA-negative FDG-positive imaging for 3 patients. Dual-tracer PET for PCa may assist in characterising high-risk disease during primary staging and restaging. Further studies are required to determine the additive benefit of FDG PET and if the FDG-positive phenotype may indicate a poorer prognosis.

Identifiers

PMID34456998
PMCPMC8387192
OpenAlexW3194991360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.