ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2021
Could we adopt serum Tenascin-C assays to determine prognosis in aortic aneurysms and dissections?
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuraminidase 1 Exacerbating Aortic Dissection by Governing a Pro-Inflammatory Program in Macrophages.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is an abnormal dilatation, while acute aortic dissection is a delamination of the tunica media, forming a false lumen. Tenascin-C is a glycoprotein that can be found in situations involving tissue damage. The objective of this article is to evaluate whether Tenascin-C assays could be of use for predicting prognosis in abdominal aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissection. We conducted an integrative literature review, for which four articles were considered eligible. Two of these studies associated higher Tenascin-C levels with protective factors and lower risk of injury, whereas the other two correlated them with worse prognosis. Some authors believe that Tenascin-C could be a candidate biomarker, but these studies are still inconclusive with regard to its role in the clinical outcomes of patients with aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.