Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Caffeic Acid in Tobacco Root Exudate Defends Tobacco Plants From Infection by

Shili Li, Jing Pi, Hongjiang Zhu, Liang Yang, Xingguo Zhang, Wei Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Strategies utilized by plants to defend againstFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Waveform Optimization for theACS measurement science au · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shili LiLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jing PiLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Hongjiang ZhuLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Liang YangLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Xingguo ZhangKey Laboratory of Horticulture Science for Southern Mountainous Regions, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Wei DingLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Southwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rhizospheres, chemical barrier-forming natural compounds play a key role in preventing pathogenic bacteria from infecting plant roots. Here, we sought to identify specific phenolic exudates in tobacco (

Indexed as

antibacterial activitycaffeic acidphenolic acidsRalstonia solanacearumtobacco bacterial wilt

Identifiers

PMID34456935
PMCPMC8387680
OpenAlexW3192281926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.