ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2021
Toward More Robust Hand Gesture Recognition on EIT Data.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning-Based EIT System for Robust Gesture Recognition Under Confounding Factors.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Can You Do That Again? Time Series Consolidation as a Robust Method of Tailoring Gesture Recognition to Individual Users.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dynamic Hand Gesture Recognition Using Electrical Impedance Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Striving for more robust and natural control of multi-fingered hand prostheses, we are studying electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a method to monitor residual muscle activations. Previous work has shown promising results for hand gesture recognition, but also lacks generalization across multiple sessions and users. Thus, the present paper aims for a detailed analysis of an existing EIT dataset acquired with a 16-electrode wrist band as a prerequisite for further improvements of machine learning results on this type of signal. The performed t-SNE analysis confirms a much stronger inter-session and inter-user variance compared to the expected in-class variance. Additionally, we observe a strong drift of signals within a session. To handle these challenging problems, we propose new machine learning architectures based on deep learning, which allow to separate undesired from desired variation and thus significantly improve the classification accuracy. With these new architectures we increased cross-session classification accuracy on 12 gestures from 19.55 to 30.45%. Based on a fundamental data analysis we developed three calibration methods and thus were able to further increase cross-session classification accuracy to 39.01, 55.37, and 56.34%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.