Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2021

Fitting Splines to Axonal Arbors Quantifies Relationship Between Branch Order and Geometry.

Thomas L Athey, Jacopo Teneggi, Joshua T Vogelstein, Daniel J Tward, Ulrich Mueller, Michael I Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas L AtheyInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jacopo TeneggiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Joshua T VogelsteinInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Daniel J TwardDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Ulrich MuellerDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Michael I MillerInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USDiscovery Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Project 2 MeasurementU19AG033655 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2014 to 2026
$51.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Accessible technologies for high-throughput, whole-brain reconstructions of molecularly characterized mammalian neuronsRF1MH121539 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, MICHAEL I, MUELLER, ULRICH · 2019 to 2019
$3.6M
Multi-Scale Electronic Human Brain AtlasR01NS086888 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MORI, SUSUMU · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Pre-Doctoral Training Program in Computational MedicineT32GM119998 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MAC GABHANN, FEILIM C · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS U19 AG033655NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM119998NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH121539NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphology is crucial to identifying neuronal subtypes and understanding learning. It is also implicated in neurological disease. However, standard morphological analysis focuses on macroscopic features such as branching frequency and connectivity between regions, and often neglects the internal geometry of neurons. In this work, we treat neuron trace points as a sampling of differentiable curves and fit them with a set of branching B-splines. We designed our representation with the Frenet-Serret formulas from differential geometry in mind. The Frenet-Serret formulas completely characterize smooth curves, and involve two parameters, curvature and torsion. Our representation makes it possible to compute these parameters from neuron traces in closed form. These parameters are defined continuously along the curve, in contrast to other parameters like tortuosity which depend on start and end points. We applied our method to a dataset of cortical projection neurons traced in two mouse brains, and found that the parameters are distributed differently between primary, collateral, and terminal axon branches, thus quantifying geometric differences between different components of an axonal arbor. The results agreed in both brains, further validating our representation. The code used in this work can be readily applied to neuron traces in SWC format and is available in our open-source Python package brainlit: http://brainlit.neurodata.io/.

Indexed as

axoncurvaturemorphologymouseneuronprojectionpythonspline

Identifiers

PMID34456702
PMCPMC8385655
OpenAlexW3152396844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.