Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456696›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Could Brain-Computer Interface Be a New Therapeutic Approach for Body Integrity Dysphoria?

Stuti Chakraborty, Gianluca Saetta, Colin Simon, Bigna Lenggenhager, Kathy Ruddy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stuti ChakrabortyOccupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Gianluca SaettaDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Colin SimonTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Bigna LenggenhagerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kathy RuddyTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Zurich · CHChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients suffering from body integrity dysphoria (BID) desire to become disabled, arising from a mismatch between the desired body and the physical body. We focus here on the most common variant, characterized by the desire for amputation of a healthy limb. In most reported cases, amputation of the rejected limb entirely alleviates the distress of the condition and engenders substantial improvement in quality of life. Since BID can lead to life-long suffering, it is essential to identify an effective form of treatment that causes the least amount of alteration to the person's anatomical structure and functionality. Treatment methods involving medications, psychotherapy, and vestibular stimulation have proven largely ineffective. In this hypothesis article, we briefly discuss the characteristics, etiology, and current treatment options available for BID before highlighting the need for new, theory driven approaches. Drawing on recent findings relating to functional and structural brain correlates of BID, we introduce the idea of brain-computer interface (BCI)/neurofeedback approaches to target altered patterns of brain activity, promote re-ownership of the limb, and/or attenuate stress and negativity associated with the altered body representation.

Indexed as

apotemnophiliabody integrity dysphoriabody integrity identity disorderbody representationbrain–computer interfaceneurofeedbacksomatoparaphreniaxenomelia

Identifiers

PMID34456696
PMCPMC8385143
OpenAlexW3160149341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.