ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Differences in Wall Shear Stress Between High-Risk and Low-Risk Plaques in Patients With Moderate Carotid Artery Stenosis: A 4D Flow MRI Study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Metrics and Arterial Dysfunction: Insights From a Novel Microfluidic Device.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Investigating association of triglycerides with hemodynamic parameters in patients with Low cardiovascular risk using 4D flow MRI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Multi-VENC 4D Flow MRI: Incorporating Turbulent Kinetic Energy for Clinical Validity.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- High Wall Shear Stress Is Related to Complicated American Heart Association Lesion Type VI Plaques in Mild-to-Moderate ICA Stenosis: A 3D Cardiovascular MRI Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- The Role of 4D Flow MRI-derived Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the risk stratification of carotid plaque hemodynamic using four-dimensional blood flow technology.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Advances in the Computational Assessment of Disturbed Coronary Flow and Wall Shear Stress: A Contemporary Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- The hemodynamic and geometric characteristics of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque formation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Observation of intracranial artery and venous sinus hemodynamics using compressed sensing-accelerated 4D flow MRI: performance at different acceleration factors.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Wave Intensity Analysis from 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Imaging and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Vulnerable Carotid Plaques and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Plaque Classification and Segmentation.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Carotid geometry is independently associated with complicated carotid artery plaques.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Proximal Region of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Shows More Intraplaque Hemorrhage: The Plaque at Risk Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Utility of vector flow mapping technology in quantitative assessment of carotid wall shear stress in hypertensive patients: A preliminary study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Creating patient-specific vein models to characterize wall shear stress in hemodialysis population.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the difference in wall shear stress (WSS) (axial, circumferential, and 3D) between high-risk and low-risk plaques in patients with moderate carotid artery stenosis and to identify which time points and directions play the dominant roles in determining the risk associated with plaques. Forty carotid arteries in 30 patients were examined in this study. All patients underwent high-resolution vessel wall (HRVW) imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and 4D flow MRI; HRVW imaging and DWI were used to separate low- and high-risk plaque. Twenty-four high-risk plaques and 16 low-risk plaques were enrolled. An independent-sample
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.