Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456594›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Improving the Applicability and Feasibility of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Primary Care: Recommendations for Guideline Development and Implementation.

Lu Han, Linan Zeng, Yanjun Duan, Kexin Chen, Jiajie Yu, Honghao Li, Qiusha Yi, Youping Li, Lingli Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lu HanDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Linan ZengDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yanjun DuanCollege of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Kexin ChenWest China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jiajie YuChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre/Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Honghao LiWest China Hospital Institute of Management, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qiusha YiDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Youping LiChinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre/Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Lingli ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo give recommendations for the development of primary care clinical practice guideline (CPG) to improve applicability and feasibility of primary care CPGs in China.

designA two-round Delphi survey.

methodsA two-round Delphi survey including guideline development methodologists and clinical practitioners from six countries was conducted. In round one, participants were asked to raise special considerations for the development of primary care CPGs through open-ended questions. In round two, participants were asked to rate the level of agreement on each recommendation item generated by round one and to raise additional recommendations. Opinions from participants were reviewed by thematic analysis. Integrated results from the Delphi survey were validated by participants.

resultsThe necessity of developing recommendations for the development of primary care CPGs were consistently recognized by participants. The main recommendations of guideline development were generated as follows: (1) considering the context of primary care institutions and the applicability of existing guidelines for primary care in planning guideline; (2) involving primary care practitioners and patients in guideline groups; (3) considering the variation of health-care resources between primary care settings when developing recommendations; (4) presenting the difference of recommendations between primary care CPG and general CPG; (5) implementing more active education and training; and (6) considering the changing of primary care medical resource when updating guideline.

conclusionIn this study, we present recommendations to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines in primary care settings. Next steps will include merging these recommendations with general guideline development methods to inform the development of guidelines for primary care.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelineguideline developmentprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34456594
PMCPMC8390795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.