ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2021
Clinical Utility of Fedratinib in Myelofibrosis.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical Guide for Managing Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Patients with Organ Dysfunction.Oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapies for Myeloproliferative Hypereosinophilic Neoplasms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Fedratinib in chronic kidney disease: antifibrotic potential and renal safety signals from integrated network toxicology and pharmacovigilance.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Impact of Ruxolitinib Interactions on JAK2 JH1 Domain Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- DNA Methylation in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Prognostic Role and Therapeutic Implications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- JAK2 inhibitors for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: current status and future directions.Molecular diversity · 2024Review
- The application of JAK inhibitors in the peri-transplantation period of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.Annals of hematology · 2024Review
- How I manage anemia related to myelofibrosis and its treatment regimens.Annals of hematology · 2023Review
- Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematologic malignancy characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms with a propensity towards leukemic transformation. Constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway is a well-described pathogenic feature of MF. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only curative therapy, but due to high morbidity and mortality this option is not available for most patients. There are two approved targeted therapy options for MF, ruxolitinib and fedratinib. In this review, we discuss the clinical utility of fedratinib in the myelofibrosis treatment paradigm. Fedratinib has shown impressive pre-clinical and clinical efficacy in patients with untreated MF as well as in those with ruxolitinib intolerance and those with relapsed/refractory MF. Here, we review the pre-clinical and clinical trials that led to the approval of fedratinib, and the ongoing late-phase trials. We highlight several areas regarding the clinical utility of fedratinib that remain unanswered. We discuss the limitations of fedratinib and address areas that are understudied and require further clinical evaluation and research. The approval of fedratinib has provided a significant expansion to the very limited treatment armamentarium available to patients with MF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.