ReviewGut and liver2022
Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Review in Gut and liver, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With Simplified Macroscopic On-site Evaluation (With Video).DEN open · 2027Article
- Upfront unroofing of subepithelial lesions using cold snare in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study from Switzerland.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Advanced Gastric Cancer Presenting as a Giant Subepithelial Lesion: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Natural History of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions Measuring 1 to 2 cm.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Factors influencing anxiety and depression among patients with digestive tract subepithelial lesions.World journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Correlation between imaging features and pathological risk of gastric stromal tumors in endoscopic ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Dental-floss traction-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of a gastrointestinal exophytic tumor: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the utility of three-dimensional imaging for preoperative assessment of gastric subepithelial tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Approach to Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: From Differential Diagnosis to Histologic Confirmation.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis of esophageal subepithelial lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A new endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions using loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering and Its Influence on Healthcare Structure: Current and Future Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Hemoperitoneum Caused by Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Gastric granular cell tumor: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Prevalence and natural course of incidental gastric subepithelial tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Using Digital Endosonography Image Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024Review
- Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- [Approach to Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A diagnosis of subepithelial tumors (SETs) is sometimes difficult due to the existence of overlying mucosa on the lesions, which hampers optical diagnosis by conventional endoscopy and tissue sampling with standard biopsy forceps. Imaging modalities, by using computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are mandatory to noninvasively collect the target's information and to opt candidates for further evaluation. Particularly, EUS is an indispensable diagnostic modality for assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating the possibility of malignancy. The diagnostic ability of EUS appears increased by the combined use of contrast-enhancement or elastography. Histology is the gold standard for obtaining the final diagnosis. Tissue sampling requires special techniques to break the mucosal barrier. Although EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is commonly applied, mucosal cutting biopsy and mucosal incision-assisted biopsy are comparable methods to definitively obtain tissues from the exposed surface of lesions and seem more useful than EUS-FNA for small SETs. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have a potential to drastically change the diagnostic strategy for SETs. Development and establishment of noninvasive methods including AI-assisted diagnosis are expected to provide an alternative to invasive, histological diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.