ArticleJournal of healthcare quality research
[Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on specialized healthcare training in a teaching center].
Article in Journal of healthcare quality research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences of family and community care physicians and nurse residents in Madrid regarding their training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a photovoice study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- [COVID-19 pandemic: An opportunity for specialized health training?]Journal of healthcare quality researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluation of the impact of the health crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic on specialized healthcare training in a teaching center.
methodsCross-sectional descriptive study, by means of an electronic questionnaire sent to 167 residents in June 2020, to evaluate the burden of care, suspension of rotations and Covid-19 symptoms. The impact on the acquisition of professional competencies was measured using a four-level Likert scale (none, a little, quiet, a lot). The profile of acquired competencies was constructed and its association with the professional profile was studied using Generalized Linear Models. The qualitative approach was carried out through an open question on how it influenced their learning and the different categories were extracted through triangulation.
resultsThe impact on learning was important for 94.8% of the residents. A total of 81.4% left the rotations they were doing and reported high workload, loss of training opportunities, uncertainty and ethical conflicts. They appreciated significant learning in the competencies of teamwork (93.2%), professionalism (86.2%), ethics (79.9%) and communication (78%). Technical competencies were deficient. The final balance of learning was perceived as positive by 54.4%, especially residents in central services and medical specialties. A total of 67.8% felt overwhelmed at times due to fatigue-emotional impact, care overload, ethical conflicts and lack of resources.
conclusionsThe Covid-19 pandemic had an exceptional impact on specialized health care training. It is necessary to re-evaluate training programs to ensure the acquisition of the technical competencies that are lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.