Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34456094›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2021

Key metrics to expanding the pipeline of successful antibody-drug conjugates.

Ian Nessler, Bruna Menezes, Greg M Thurber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The multifaceted role of MUC1 in tumor therapy resistance.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeted Fluorogenic Cyanine Carbamates EnableJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian NesslerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Bruna MenezesDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Greg M ThurberDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: gthurber@umich.edu.

Funding

Maximizing Antibody Drug Conjugate Efficacy through Multiple Mechanisms of ActionR35GM128819 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Greg Thurber · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the recent FDA approval of six new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is promising, attrition of ADCs during clinical development remains high. The inherent complexity of ADCs is a double-edged sword that provides opportunities for perfecting therapeutic action while also increasing confounding factors in therapeutic failures. ADC design drives their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and requires deeper analysis than the commonly used C

Indexed as

ImmunoconjugatesNeoplasmsBenchmarkingHumansImmunoconjugatesimmunotherapyintratumor drug distributiontranslational pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID34456094
PMCPMC8519343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.