Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455851›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2022

Effect of Superstitious Beliefs and Risk Intuitions on Genetic Test Decisions.

Kristen E Riley, Andrew L Sussman, Elizabeth Schofield, Dolores D Guest, Yvonne T Dailey, Matthew R Schwartz, David B Buller, Keith Hunley, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Marianne Berwick and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristen E RileyRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-4933
Andrew L SussmanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Elizabeth SchofieldMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4745-3707
Dolores D GuestUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Yvonne T DaileyUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Matthew R SchwartzUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9563-5727
David B BullerKlein Buendel, Inc., Golden, CO, USA.
Keith HunleyUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstUniversity of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Marianne BerwickUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jennifer L HayMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Personalized Genomic Testing for Melanoma: Maximizing Personal Utility and ReachR01CA181241 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BERWICK, MARIANNE, HAY, JENNIFER L · 2014 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181241NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMoving beyond numeric representations of risk perceptions, we examine cognitive causation, or superstitious thinking, and negative affect in risk as predictors of

methodsParticipants (

resultsThose with higher negative affect in risk were less likely to return a saliva sample for testing (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.96-0.99). Those with higher cognitive causation reported more fear (

conclusionNegative affect in risk did not hamper test information seeking, although it did inhibit the uptake of genetic testing. Those with higher cognitive causation showed more fear regarding their test result, as indicated by higher distress in those who received average-risk results and lower believability in those who received higher-risk results.

Indexed as

IntuitionSkin NeoplasmsCognitionFearGenetic TestingHumansdecision makinggenetic testingmelanomarisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34455851
PMCPMC8882703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.