Trial reportCirculation2021
Abbreviated Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Bleeding Risk With or Without Oral Anticoagulant Therapy After Coronary Stenting: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Circulation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03023020 (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2024.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2024Guideline
- Antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with established coronary atherosclerotic disease.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Aspirin-Free Strategy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation: Prespecified Subgroup Analysis From the STOPDAPT-3 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of dual-pathway inhibitor therapy on outcomes after femoropopliteal in-stent occlusion.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Antiplatelet therapy and central nervous system hematomas: a cohort study using real-world data from the FAERS and VigiAccess databases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Clinical Review.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Review
- Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Long-Term Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Procedural and Antithrombotic Therapy Optimization in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- The role of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stent insertion.Australian prescriber · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of Prognostic Models for Bleeding and Ischemia in Elderly Patients With Comorbid Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Novel horizons in anticoagulation: the emerging role of factor XI inhibitors across different settings.Haematologica · 2024Review
- Antithrombotic management in atrial fibrillation patients following percutaneous coronary intervention: A clinical review.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Review
- Current Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- What US Cardiology Can Learn From the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- One-month DAPT after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients at high-bleeding risk: an individual patient data pooled analysis of the SENIOR and POEM trials.European heart journal open · 2024Article
- [Survey on blood thinning therapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors at 20 institutions in 20 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients at high bleeding risk with or without oral anticoagulation (OAC) after coronary stenting remains unclear.
methodsIn the investigator-initiated, randomize, open-label MASTER DAPT trial (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated Versus Standard DAPT Regimen), 4579 patients at high bleeding risk were randomized after 1-month dual APT to abbreviated or nonabbreviated APT strategies. Randomization was stratified by concomitant OAC indication. In this subgroup analysis, we report outcomes of populations with or without an OAC indication. In the population with an OAC indication, patients changed immediately to single APT for 5 months (abbreviated regimen) or continued ≥2 months of dual APT and single APT thereafter (nonabbreviated regimen). Patients without an OAC indication changed to single APT for 11 months (abbreviated regimen) or continued ≥5 months of dual APT and single APT thereafter (nonabbreviated regimen). Coprimary outcomes at 335 days after randomization were net adverse clinical outcomes (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding events); major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke); and type 2, 3, or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding.
resultsNet adverse clinical outcomes or major adverse cardiac and cerebral events did not differ with abbreviated versus nonabbreviated APT regimens in patients with OAC indication (n=1666; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.60-1.15]; and HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.60-1.30], respectively) or without OAC indication (n=2913; HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.77-1.33]; or HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.44];
conclusionsRates of net adverse clinical outcomes and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events did not differ with abbreviated APT in patients with high bleeding risk with or without an OAC indication and resulted in lower bleeding rates in patients without an OAC indication. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03023020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.