Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455650›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2022

Improving and evaluating the adhesion and stability of make-up by enhancing the affinity between skin/make-up layer.

Hyungjoon Jeon, Tae Geun Kwon, Yong Won Shin, Yeeun Cho, Hyunmi Yang, Sang-Wook Park, Young-Sook Song

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving and evaluating the adhesion and stability of make-up by enhancing the affinity between skin/make-up layer.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyungjoon JeonLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-0969
Tae Geun KwonLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Won ShinLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeeun ChoLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunmi YangLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Wook ParkLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Sook SongLG Household & Health Care (LG H&H), LG Science Park R&D Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
LG (United States) · US

Funding

Cosmetics Research Institute of LG Household and Health Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMake-up clumps, bumps and collapses are the three factors that determine how well make-up has been performed. The purpose of this study is to reduce the three factors mentioned above by using amphiphilic substances to increase the affinity between the skin and the make-up layer. In addition, it aims to evaluate the improvement of the make-up layer by developing an objective make-up layer evaluation method.

methodsExperiments were performed in an attempt to increase the affinity between the skin and the make-up layer by minimizing the difference in surface energy between the two. Multiple types of artificial skin (leather and bio-skin) were used and treated to form the liquid foundation layer. Qualitative evaluation of the make-up layer was conducted by analyzing the surface, cross-section, and fracture area of the make-up layer, using the evaluation method proposed in this study.

resultsAfter applying this method and taking measurements by 3D surface analysis, the surface roughness of the make-up layer reduced by 46%, and the maximum thickness of the make-up layer reduced by about 50% in comparison with the control group (method not applied). In the case of the make-up layer to which this method was applied, two-dimensional cross-sectional Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image analysis confirmed that agglomeration was reduced, and the thickness of the make-up layer was also reduced by an average of 54%. According to this result, the technique of increasing the affinity between the skin and the make-up layer reduces the level of aggregation of make-up and encourages the formation of a uniform and thin make-up layer. Also, the fracture area after motion simulation was reduced by 33%. These results indicate that the method of increasing the affinity between skin/make-up membranes positively affects the formation of a uniform make-up layer.

conclusionIncreasing the affinity by reducing the surface energy between the skin and the make-up layer plays an important role in forming a thin and uniform make-up layer by improving the problems of lifting, agglomeration, and collapse of the make-up. In addition, it has been confirmed that through this method, the quality of consumer experience related to make-up satisfaction can be improved. The results show that objective analyses of make-up help the understanding of the quality of consumer experience on make-up.

Indexed as

SkinSkin, ArtificialCross-Sectional StudiesDermisHumansaggregationamphiphilic polymermake-up affinityroughnessskin affinity

Identifiers

PMID34455650
PMCPMC9907639
OpenAlexW3197370489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.