Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455549›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2021

Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Spiritual Care Competence Questionnaire (SCCQ).

Tania Pastrana, Eckhard Frick, Alicia Krikorian, Leticia Ascencio, Florencia Galeazzi, Arndt Büssing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tania PastranaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, RWTH University Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Eckhard FrickKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Alicia KrikorianPain and Palliative Care Group, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.
Leticia AscencioServicio de Cuidados Paliativos, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, México.
Florencia GaleazziHospice Buen Samaritano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arndt BüssingProfessorship Quality of Life, Spirituality and Coping, Institute of Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 59313, Herdecke, Germany. Arndt.Buessing@uni-wh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-7950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to validate the Spanish version of the Spiritual Care Competence Questionnaire (SCCQ) in a sample of 791 health care professionals from Spanish speaking countries coming principally from Argentina, Colombia, Mexico and Spain. Exploratory factor analysis pointed to six factors with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.90), which are in line with the factors of the primary version of the SCCQ. Conversation competences and Perception of spiritual needs competences scored highest, and Documentation competences and Team spirit the lowest, Empowerment competences and Spiritual self-awareness competences in-between. The Spanish Version of the SCCQ can be used for assessment of spiritual care competencies, planning of educational activities and for comparisons as well as monitoring/follow-up after implementation of improvement strategies.

Indexed as

Spiritual TherapiesTranslationsHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainSpiritualitySurveys and QuestionnairesCompetencesQuestionnaireSpiritual careTranslationValidation

Identifiers

PMID34455549
PMCPMC8484237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.