Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455540›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment.

Thierry Manos, Marius Nedelcu, Anamaria Nedelcu, Michel Gagner, Abdul Kader Weiss, Christophe Bastid, Sergio Carandina, Patrick Noel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endoscopy in surgery.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thierry ManosELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France.
Marius NedelcuELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France. nedelcu.marius@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-3511
Anamaria NedelcuELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Place du 4 Septembre, 83100, Toulon, France.
Michel GagnerSacre Coeur Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Abdul Kader WeissEmirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Christophe BastidELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France.
Sergio CarandinaELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Place du 4 Septembre, 83100, Toulon, France.
Patrick NoelELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.

methodsAll consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.

resultsA total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.

conclusionsAlthough there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAlgorithmsAnastomotic LeakGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDouble pigtailEndoscopyLeak sizeSeptotomySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.