ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
An inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm with adaptive weight adjustment for LDR pancreatic brachytherapy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) algorithm has shown good results in cancer surgical treatment planning. However, an adaptive approach has not well been proposed for different shapes and sizes of tumors. The purpose of this study was to propose an adaptive, efficient and safe algorithm to get high-quality treatment dose planning, which is presented for pancreatic cancer.
methodsAn algorithm employs an optimized IPSA and an adaptive process for adjusting the weight of organs at risk (OAR) and tumor. The algorithm, which was combined with ant colony optimization, was further optimized to reduce the number of needles. It could meet the clinical dose objectives within the tumors, reduce the dose distribution within the OAR and minimize the number of needles. Ten clinical cases were chosen randomly from patients, previously successfully treated in clinic to test our method. The algorithm was validated against clinical cases, using clinically relevant dose parameters.
resultsThe results were compared with clinical results in ten cases, indicating that the dose distribution within the tumor meets the clinical dose objectives. The dose received by OAR had been greatly reduced, and the number of needles could be reduced by about 50%. It was a significant improvement over the clinical treatment planning.
conclusionsIn this paper, we have devised an algorithm to optimize the treatment planning in brachytherapy. The method in this paper could meet the clinical dose objectives and reduce the difficulty of operation. The results were clinically acceptable. This algorithm is also applicable to other cancers such as lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.