ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Clinical difference after the first optic neuritis between aquaporin-4-IgG-associated and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disorders.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical risk factors for recurrence in adult-onset myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Elevated serum levels of bone morphogenetic protein-9 are associated with better outcome in AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the difference in clinical course after the first optic neuritis (ON) between aquaporin-4 IgG-associated disorder (AQPAD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disorder (MOGAD)
methodsIn this study, 31 eyes in 24 patients with AQPAD and 26 eyes in 18 patients with MOGAD were included. The clinical course for the first 6 months after the first ON was monitored by a retrospective cohort study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed before the onset and at nadir, 2 weeks (2 W), 1 month (1 M), 2 months (2 M), 3 months (3 M) and 6 months (6 M). The decimal BCVA was converted to the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analyses.
resultsMOGAD eyes showed longer median number of days from ON onset to nadir (6.0 vs. 11.5, P = 0.012) and to treatment (7.0 vs. 11.0, P = 0.020) than AQPAD eyes. The median logMAR was higher in AQPAD eyes than in MOGAD eyes at nadir (2.00 vs. 1.77, P = 0.050), 2 W (1.85 vs. 0.40, P = 0.001), 2 M (0.023 vs. - 0.079, P = 0.032) and 3 M (0.046 vs. - 0.079, P = 0.002). The median time to recovery of BCVA to 0.7 was longer in AQPAD eyes than in MOGAD eyes (44.0 vs. 21.0 days, P = 0.024), but that to BCVA 1.0 was not different between the two disorders (168.0 vs. 40.0 days, respectively, P = 0.056).
conclusionCompared with MOGAD eyes, AQPAD eyes tended to show worse visual outcome even during the first ON episode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34455476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.