Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455337›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Health behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey in Germany.

Jutta Mata, Alexander Wenz, Tobias Rettig, Maximiliane Reifenscheid, Katja Möhring, Ulrich Krieger, Sabine Friedel, Marina Fikel, Carina Cornesse, Annelies G Blom and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Predicting Weight Control Intentions: An Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jutta MataHealth Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Center for Data Science, University of Mannheim, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: mata@uni-mannheim.de.
Alexander WenzCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany; School of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, University of Mannheim, Germany.
Tobias RettigCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Maximiliane ReifenscheidCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Katja MöhringCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Ulrich KriegerCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Sabine FriedelCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Marina FikelCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Carina CornesseCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany.
Annelies G BlomCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany; Data Science, School of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science, University of Mannheim, Germany.
Elias NaumannCollaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms," University of Mannheim, Germany; Center for European Studies, Harvard University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the mental health response to repeated and prolonged stress during the COVID-19 related lockdown and the role of specific health behaviors to buffer against this stress.

methodsIn a longitudinal study with several measurement points covering three months during the COVID-19 pandemic, about 3500 randomly selected participants representative of the German population reported on their mental health (anxiety, depression, loneliness) and health behaviors (screen time, snack consumption, physical activity).

resultsSymptoms of anxiety, depression, and loneliness were highest shortly after the lockdown came into effect. Over time, the symptoms were stable or went down slightly, corresponding to patterns of habituation. Among people with higher vulnerability to poor mental health during the lockdown (e.g., women), the proportion with high levels of anxiety, depression, and loneliness was considerably larger. These groups also reported fewer health-promoting behaviors. More screen time, more snacking, and less physical activity were related to higher symptoms of anxiety, depression, and loneliness across all time points. Changes in health behaviors over time mostly did not predict changes in mental health symptoms.

conclusionsMental health and engagement in protective health behaviors was lowest at the start of the lockdown. Health behaviors mostly returned to pre-lockdown levels within three months. Engaging in healthier behaviors was associated with better mental health. Policy implications of these findings are discussed. This study provides important insights into (unintended) side effects of an international crisis and can contribute to a better understanding of how to preserve mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionFemaleGermanyHealth BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Mental healthPhysical activityScreen timeSnacking

Identifiers

PMID34455337
PMCPMC8479385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.