Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455212›Full record

ArticleMolecular immunology2021

A structural-based machine learning method to classify binding affinities between TCR and peptide-MHC complexes.

Kalyani Dhusia, Zhaoqian Su, Yinghao Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. TCR-pMHC Binding Specificity Prediction From Structure Using Graph Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kalyani DhusiaDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, United States.
Zhaoqian SuDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, United States.
Yinghao WuDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, United States. Electronic address: yinghao.wu@einstein.yu.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

A multiscale model for binding kinetics of membrane receptors on cell surfacesR01GM120238 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI WU, YINGHAO · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Computational models for the signaling of tumor necrosis factor receptor on cell surfacesR01GM122804 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI WU, YINGHAO · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activation of T cells is triggered by the interactions of T cell receptors (TCRs) with their epitopes, which are peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surfaces of antigen presenting cells (APC). While each TCR can only recognize a specific subset from a large repertoire of peptide-MHC (pMHC) complexes, it is very often that peptides in this subset share little sequence similarity. This is known as the specificity and cross-reactivity of T cells, respectively. The binding affinities between different types of TCRs and pMHC are the major driving force to shape this specificity and cross-reactivity in T cell recognition. The binding affinities, furthermore, are determined by the sequence and structural properties at the interfaces between TCRs and pMHC. Fortunately, a wealth of data on binding and structures of TCR-pMHC interactions becomes publicly accessible in online resources, which offers us the opportunity to develop a random forest classifier for predicting the binding affinities between TCR and pMHC based on the structure of their complexes. Specifically, the structure and sequence of a given complex were projected onto a high-dimensional feature space as the input of the classifier, which was then trained by a large-scale benchmark dataset. Based on the cross-validation results, we found that our machine learning model can predict if the binding affinity of a given TCR-pMHC complex is stronger or weaker than a predefined threshold with an overall accuracy approximately around 75 %. The significance of our prediction was estimated by statistical analysis. Moreover, more than 60 % of binding affinities in the ATLAS database can be successfully classified into groups within the range of 2 kcal/mol. Additionally, we show that TCR-pMHC complexes with strong binding affinity prefer hydrophobic interactions between amino acids with large aromatic rings instead of electrostatic interactions. Our results therefore provide insights to design engineered TCRs which enhance the specificity for their targeted epitopes. Taken together, this method can serve as a useful addition to a suite of existing approaches which study binding between TCR and pMHC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningHumansLymphocyte ActivationMajor Histocompatibility ComplexProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellBinding affinityRandom forest classifierTCR-pMHC complexes

Identifiers

PMID34455212
PMCPMC10811653
OpenAlexW3197908803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.