Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455099›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics2022

Intimate Partner Violence and the Pediatric Electronic Health Record: A Qualitative Study.

Kimberly A Randell, Maya I Ragavan, Lindsey A Query, Mangai Sundaram, Megan Bair-Merritt, Elizabeth Miller, Mary Denise Dowd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Children.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimberly A RandellDivision of Emergency Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Kansas City, Mo. Electronic address: karandell@cmh.edu.
Maya I RagavanDivision of General Academic Pediatrics (MI Ragavan), University of Pittsburgh/Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Lindsey A QueryDivision of Emergency Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Kansas City, Mo.
Mangai SundaramUniversity of California Berkley (M Sundaram), Berkeley, Calif.
Megan Bair-MerrittDivision of General Academic Pediatrics (M B-Merritt), Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Elizabeth MillerDivision of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine (E Miller), University of Pittsburgh/Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Mary Denise DowdDivision of Emergency Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (KA Randell, LA Query, and MD Dowd), Kansas City, Mo.

Funding

Training in Health Services Research for Vulnerable PopulationsT32HS022242 · AHRQ · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI LAROCHELLE, MARC · 2013 to 2024
$4.1M
Promoting Healthy Relationships among At-Risk Adolescents: A Feasibility Trial in the Emergency DepartmentK23HD098299 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI RANDELL, KIMBERLY ANNE · 2020 to 2024
$790k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS022242NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD098299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore expert perspectives on risks associated with the pediatric electronic health record (EHR) for intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and their children and to identify strategies that may mitigate these risks.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with multidisciplinary pediatric IPV experts (nursing, physicians, social workers, hospital security, IPV advocates) recruited via snowball sampling. We coded interview transcripts using thematic analysis, then consolidated codes into themes.

resultsTwenty-eight participants completed interviews. Participants identified the primary source of risk as an abuser's potential access to a child's EHR by legal and illegal means. They noted that abuser's access to multiple pediatric EHR components (eg, online health portals, clinical notes, contact information) may result in escalated violence, stalking, and manipulation of IPV survivors. Suggested risk mitigation strategies included limited and coded documentation, limiting EHR access, and discussing documentation with the IPV survivor. Challenges to using these strategies included healthcare providers' usual practice of detailed documentation and that information documented may confer both risk and benefit concurrently. Reported potential benefits of the pediatric EHR for IPV survivors included ensuring continuity of care, decreasing need to repeatedly talk about trauma histories, and communication of safety plans.

conclusionsOur findings suggest the pediatric EHR may confer both risks and benefits for IPV survivors and their children. Further work is needed to develop best practices to address IPV risks related to the pediatric EHR, to ensure consistent use of these practices, and to include these practices as standard functionalities of the pediatric EHR.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsIntimate Partner ViolenceChildCommunicationHumansQualitative ResearchSurvivorselectronic health recordsintimate partner violence, qualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID34455099
PMCPMC8882201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.