Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34455075›Full record

ArticleTravel medicine and infectious disease

Effect of social isolation in dengue cases in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil: An analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gleice Margarete de Souza Conceição, Gerson Laurindo Barbosa, Camila Lorenz, Ana Carolina Dias Bocewicz, Lidia Maria Reis Santana, Cristiano Corrêa de Azevedo Marques, Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Travel medicine and infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gleice Margarete de Souza ConceiçãoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gerson Laurindo BarbosaEndemics Control Superintendence (SUCEN), Sao Paulo State Department of Health, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Camila LorenzDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: camilalorenz@usp.br.
Ana Carolina Dias BocewiczDisease Control Coordination (CCD SES/SP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Lidia Maria Reis SantanaEpidemiological Surveillance Center "Professor Alexandre Vranjac" - Sao Paulo State Department of Health (CVE/SES-SP), Sao Paulo, Brazil; Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiano Corrêa de Azevedo MarquesEndemics Control Superintendence (SUCEN), Sao Paulo State Department of Health, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Chiaravalloti-NetoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown that human mobility is an important factor in dengue epidemiology. Changes in mobility resulting from COVID-19 pandemic set up a real-life situation to test this hypothesis. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of reduced mobility due to this pandemic in the occurrence of dengue in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

methodIt is an ecological study of time series, developed between January and August 2020. We use the number of confirmed dengue cases and residential mobility, on a daily basis, from secondary information sources. Mobility was represented by the daily percentage variation of residential population isolation, obtained from the Google database. We modeled the relationship between dengue occurrence and social distancing by negative binomial regression, adjusted for seasonality. We represent the social distancing dichotomously (isolation versus no isolation) and consider lag for isolation from the dates of occurrence of dengue.

resultsThe risk of dengue decreased around 9.1% (95% CI: 14.2 to 3.7) in the presence of isolation, considering a delay of 20 days between the degree of isolation and the dengue first symptoms.

conclusionsWe have shown that mobility can play an important role in the epidemiology of dengue and should be considered in surveillance and control activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19DengueBrazilHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social IsolationControlCOVID-19DengueMobilitySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34455075
PMCPMC9760101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.