Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34454675›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2021

Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment.

Lucia Hug, Danzhen You, Hannah Blencowe, Anu Mishra, Zhengfan Wang, Miranda J Fix, Jon Wakefield, Allisyn C Moran, Victor Gaigbe-Togbe, Emi Suzuki and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 274 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
274citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
132.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

274 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 521 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Burden of Dengue in Pregnant Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Machine Learning for Predicting Stillbirth: A Systematic Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Humans are not unique: difficult birth is common in placental mammals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review

214 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Lucia HugDivision of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: lhug@unicef.org.
Danzhen YouDivision of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA.
Hannah BlencoweMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anu MishraDivision of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA.
Zhengfan WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Miranda J FixUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jon WakefieldUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Allisyn C MoranDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Victor Gaigbe-TogbeUN Population Division, New York, NY, USA.
Emi SuzukiDevelopment Data Group, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Dianna M BlauCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Simon CousensMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andreea CreangaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Trevor CroftThe Demographic and Health Surveys Program, ICF, Rockville, MD, USA.
Kenneth HillStanton-Hill Research, Moultonborough, NH, USA.
K S JosephUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Salome MaswimeUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Elizabeth M McClureRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Robert PattinsonSAMRC/UP Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jon PedersenMikro, Oslo, Norway.
Lucy K SmithDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Jennifer ZeitlinInserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Leontine AlkemaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation and its Core Stillbirth Estimation Group
United Nations Children's Fund · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Washington · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USHill Top Research (United States) · USICF International (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USRTI International · USSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Pretoria · ZAWorld Bank Group · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStillbirths are a major public health issue and a sensitive marker of the quality of care around pregnancy and birth. The UN Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (2016-30) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (led by UNICEF and WHO) call for an end to preventable stillbirths. A first step to prevent stillbirths is obtaining standardised measurement of stillbirth rates across countries. We estimated stillbirth rates and their trends for 195 countries from 2000 to 2019 and assessed progress over time.

methodsFor a systematic assessment, we created a dataset of 2833 country-year datapoints from 171 countries relevant to stillbirth rates, including data from registration and health information systems, household-based surveys, and population-based studies. After data quality assessment and exclusions, we used 1531 datapoints to estimate country-specific stillbirth rates for 195 countries from 2000 to 2019 using a Bayesian hierarchical temporal sparse regression model, according to a definition of stillbirth of at least 28 weeks' gestational age. Our model combined covariates with a temporal smoothing process such that estimates were informed by data for country-periods with high quality data, while being based on covariates for country-periods with little or no data on stillbirth rates. Bias and additional uncertainty associated with observations based on alternative stillbirth definitions and source types, and observations that were subject to non-sampling errors, were included in the model. We compared the estimated stillbirth rates and trends to previously reported mortality estimates in children younger than 5 years.

findingsGlobally in 2019, an estimated 2·0 million babies (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 1·9-2·2) were stillborn at 28 weeks or more of gestation, with a global stillbirth rate of 13·9 stillbirths (90% UI 13·5-15·4) per 1000 total births. Stillbirth rates in 2019 varied widely across regions, from 22·8 stillbirths (19·8-27·7) per 1000 total births in west and central Africa to 2·9 (2·7-3·0) in western Europe. After west and central Africa, eastern and southern Africa and south Asia had the second and third highest stillbirth rates in 2019. The global annual rate of reduction in stillbirth rate was estimated at 2·3% (90% UI 1·7-2·7) from 2000 to 2019, which was lower than the 2·9% (2·5-3·2) annual rate of reduction in neonatal mortality rate (for neonates aged <28 days) and the 4·3% (3·8-4·7) annual rate of reduction in mortality rate among children aged 1-59 months during the same period. Based on the lower bound of the 90% UIs, 114 countries had an estimated decrease in stillbirth rate since 2000, with four countries having a decrease of at least 50·0%, 28 having a decrease of 25·0-49·9%, 50 having a decrease of 10·0-24·9%, and 32 having a decrease of less than 10·0%. For the remaining 81 countries, we found no decrease in stillbirth rate since 2000. Of these countries, 34 were in sub-Saharan Africa, 16 were in east Asia and the Pacific, and 15 were in Latin America and the Caribbean.

interpretationProgress in reducing the rate of stillbirths has been slow compared with decreases in the mortality rate of children younger than 5 years. Accelerated improvements are most needed in the regions and countries with high stillbirth rates, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Future prevention of stillbirths needs increased efforts to raise public awareness, improve data collection, assess progress, and understand public health priorities locally, all of which require investment.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

Indexed as

Global HealthFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornModels, StatisticalPregnancyStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID34454675
PMCPMC8417352
OpenAlexW3195790693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.