Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34454609›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

Microbial composition differs between production systems and is associated with growth performance and carcass quality in pigs.

Christian Maltecca, Rob Dunn, Yuqing He, Nathan P McNulty, Constantino Schillebeeckx, Clint Schwab, Caleb Shull, Justin Fix, Francesco Tiezzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial and Genomic Information Synergistically Contribute to Predicting Swine Performance Across Production Systems.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiple-trait genomic prediction for swine meat quality traits using gut microbiome features as a correlated trait.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian MalteccaDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Dr, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. cmaltec@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4680
Rob DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, 100 Brooks Ave, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Yuqing HeDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Dr, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Nathan P McNultyMatatu Inc., 4340 Duncan Ave Suite 211, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Constantino SchillebeeckxMatatu Inc., 4340 Duncan Ave Suite 211, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Clint SchwabAcuity Ag Solutions, 7475 State Route 127, Carlyle, IL, 62231, USA.
Caleb ShullThe Maschhoffs LLC, 7475 IL-127, Carlyle, IL, 62231, USA.
Justin FixDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Dr, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Francesco TiezziAcuity Ag Solutions, 7475 State Route 127, Carlyle, IL, 62231, USA.
North Carolina State University · USAcuity Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

National Pork Board NPB-16020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of the microbiome in livestock production has been highlighted in recent research. Currently, little is known about the microbiome's impact across different systems of production in swine, particularly between selection nucleus and commercial populations. In this paper, we investigated fecal microbial composition in nucleus versus commercial systems at different time points.

resultsWe identified microbial OTUs associated with growth and carcass composition in each of the two populations, as well as the subset common to both. The two systems were represented by individuals with sizeable microbial diversity at weaning. At later times microbial composition varied between commercial and nucleus, with species of the genus Lactobacillus more prominent in the nucleus population. In the commercial populations, OTUs of the genera Lactobacillus and Peptococcus were associated with an increase in both growth rate and fatness. In the nucleus population, members of the genus Succinivibrio were negatively correlated with all growth and carcass traits, while OTUs of the genus Roseburia had a positive association with growth parameters. Lactobacillus and Peptococcus OTUs showed consistent effects for fat deposition and daily gain in both nucleus and commercial populations. Similarly, OTUs of the Blautia genus were positively associated with daily gain and fat deposition. In contrast, an increase in the abundance of the Bacteroides genus was negatively associated with growth performance parameters.

conclusionsThe current study provides a first characterization of microbial communities' value throughout the pork production systems. It also provides information for incorporating microbial composition into the selection process in the quest for affordable and sustainable protein production in swine.

Indexed as

Carcass qualityGrowthHost geneticsMicrobial diversityMicrobiomeProduction systemSwine

Identifiers

PMID34454609
PMCPMC8403435
OpenAlexW3197488510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.