Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34454505›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

A community-based mobile clinic model delivering PrEP for HIV prevention to adolescent girls and young women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Elzette Rousseau, Linda-Gail Bekker, Robin F Julies, Connie Celum, Jennifer Morton, Rachel Johnson, Jared M Baeten, Gabrielle O'Malley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elzette RousseauDesmond Tutu Health Foundation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Elzette.Rousseau@hiv-research.org.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-6736
Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu Health Foundation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Robin F JuliesDesmond Tutu Health Foundation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Connie CelumDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Jennifer MortonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Rachel JohnsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Gabrielle O'MalleyDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757USAID AID-OAA-A15-00034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily doses of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can reduce the risk of acquiring HIV by more than 95 %. In sub-Saharan Africa, adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are at disproportionately high risk of acquiring HIV, accounting for 25 % of new infections. There are limited data available on implementation approaches to effectively reach and deliver PrEP to AGYW in high HIV burden communities.

methodsWe explored the feasibility and acceptability of providing PrEP to AGYW (aged 16-25 years) via a community-based mobile health clinic (CMHC) known as the Tutu Teen Truck (TTT) in Cape Town, South Africa. The TTT integrated PrEP delivery into its provision of comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS). We analyzed data from community meetings and in-depth interviews with 30 AGYW PrEP users to understand the benefits and challenges of PrEP delivery in this context.

resultsA total of 585 young women started PrEP at the TTT between July 2017 - October 2019. During in-depth interviews a subset of 30 AGYW described the CMHC intervention for PrEP delivery as acceptable and accessible. The TTT provided services at times and in neighborhood locations where AGYW organically congregate, thus facilitating service access and generating peer demand for PrEP uptake. The community-based nature of the CMHC, in addition to its adolescent friendly health providers, fostered a trusting provider-community-client relationship and strengthened AGYW HIV prevention self-efficacy. The integration of PrEP and SRHS service delivery was highly valued by AGYW. While the TTT's integration in the community facilitated acceptability of the PrEP delivery model, challenges faced by the broader community (community riots, violence and severe weather conditions) also at times interrupted PrEP delivery.

conclusionsPrEP delivery from a CMHC is feasible and acceptable to young women in South Africa. However, to effectively scale-up PrEP it will be necessary to develop diverse PrEP delivery locations and modalities to meet AGYW HIV prevention needs.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentFemaleHumansMobile Health UnitsSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW)Community mobile health clinic (CMHC)HIV preventionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)PrEP delivery modelsSexual reproductive health services (SRHS)

Identifiers

PMID34454505
PMCPMC8403426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.