ArticleBMC ophthalmology2021
Long-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab and aflibercept on intraocular pressure in wet age-related macular degeneration.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Prefilled vs Vial-Drawn Syringes on Sustained Increases in Intraocular Pressure in Patients Treated With Aflibercept.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the incidence of sustained elevation of intraocular pressure (SE-IOP) associated with intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) bevacizumab and aflibercept in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD).
methodsA retrospective cohort study consisting of 120 eyes from 120 patients with anti-VEGF treatment for wAMD. Three different anti-VEGF groups were considered: i) 71 cases receiving bevacizumab only, ii) 49 cases receiving bevacizumab before switch to aflibercept, iii) 49 cases after switch to aflibercept. 120 uninjected fellow eyes served as controls. SE-IOP was defined as an increase from baseline ≥5 mmHg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits. The incidence of SE-IOP was analysed using exact Poisson tests and survival analysis. The time course of IOP was evaluated with linear mixed effect modelling.
resultsIn total, 6 treated eyes (2.38% incidence per eye-year) and 9 fellow eyes (3.58% incidence per eye-year) developed SE-IOP, and survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.43). Furthermore, the incidence of SE-IOP did not differ between the three anti-VEGF groups. Comparing the injected eyes of patients under 70 years to those of patients over 70 years, there was a statistically significant difference in survival without SE-IOP (incidence of 16.7% vs 0.7%, respectively, p < 0.0001).
conclusionIntravitreal anti-VEGF injections were not associated with sustained elevation of IOP. These results do not support the claim that repeated anti-VEGF injections could elevate IOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.