Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34454413›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021

Recruitment principles and strategies for supportive care research in pediatric oncology.

Natalie Bradford, Christine Cashion, Paula Condon, Shelley Rumble, Alison Bowers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Goal-directed therapeutic exercise for paediatric posterior fossa brain tumour survivors: a qualitative analysis of experiences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie BradfordQueensland University of Technology, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Brisbane, Australia. Natalie.bradford@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-4544
Christine CashionQueensland University of Technology at Centre for Children's Health Research, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
Paula CondonQueensland University of Technology at Centre for Children's Health Research, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
Shelley RumbleOncology Services Group, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alison BowersQueensland University of Technology, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Brisbane, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariations in clinical practice contribute to negative outcomes for children with cancer. Research in this area is imperative to standardise practice, yet such research is challenging to undertake, and a significant proportion of studies fail. A common reason for failure is poor recruitment, yet little information is available to support researchers and clinicians planning such research.

methodsOur primary aim was to describe the recruitment strategies and outcomes in a tertiary children's hospital across multiple observational supportive care studies. Secondary aims were to establish principles to improve both recruitment strategies and the reporting of recruitment. We undertook a retrospective descriptive analysis of the recruitment logs and data from three studies in pediatric oncology. The mean time to recruit one participant was calculated. Common reasons for not approaching eligible participants and reasons potential participants declined are described.

resultsOf the 235 potential candidates across all studies, 186 (79%) were approached and of these 125 (67%) provided consent, with 117 (63%) completing baseline measures. We estimated recruitment per participant required an average 98 min of experienced research nurse time. Four factors are described that influence recruitment and six principles are outlined to maximise recruitment and the generalisability of research findings.

conclusionsWe highlight the recruitment experiences across three different projects in children's cancer supportive care research and provide a roadmap for other researchers planning to undertake clinical research in pediatrics.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPediatricsChildHumansPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesBarriersChildNeoplasmsRecruitmentResearch designResearch personnel

Identifiers

PMID34454413
PMCPMC8400402
OpenAlexW3197667773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.