Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453697›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2021

Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document.

P Ashley, P Anand, K Andersson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Intranasal versus sublingual sedation in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Nitrous Oxide (NMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of Midazolam in Outpatient Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Pharmacological behaviour management: a survey of Thai paediatric dentists.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Conscious sedation and dental treatment outcomes in Norwegian paediatric dentistry: a retrospective clinical audit from the Public Dental Service.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P AshleyPaediatric Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, Rockefeller Building, University St, London, WC1E 6DE, UK. p.ashley@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-5311
P AnandRoyal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, UCLH NHS Trust, 47-49 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6DG, UK.
K AnderssonDepartment of Dental Medicine, Division of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, POB 4064, SE-141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to fear and/or behaviour management problems, some children are unable to cooperate for dental treatment using local anaesthesia and psychological support alone. Sedation is required for these patients in order for dentists to be able to deliver high quality, pain-free dental care. The aim of this guideline is to evaluate the efficacy and relative efficacy of conscious sedation agents and dosages for behaviour management in paediatric dentistry and to provide guidance as to which sedative agents should be used.

methodsThese guidelines were developed using a multi-step approach adapted from that outlined by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE (2020) Developing NICE Guidelines: the manual. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/introduction#main-stages-of-guideline-development . Accessed 7 Oct 2020). Evidence for this guideline was provided from a pre-existing Cochrane review (Ashley et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD003877, 2018) supplemented by an updated search and data extraction up to May 2020.

resultsStudies were from 18 different countries and had recruited 4131 participants overall with an average of 70 participants per study. Ages ranged from 0 to 16 years with an average age of 5.6 years across all included studies. A wide variety of drugs or combinations of drugs (n = 38) were used and delivered orally, intranasally, intravenously, rectally, intramuscularly, submucosally, transmucosally or by inhalation sedation. Twenty-four different outcome measures for behaviour were used. The wide range of drug combinations and outcome measures used greatly complicated description and analysis of the data.

conclusionOral midazolam is recommended for conscious dental sedation. Midazolam delivered via other methods or nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation could be considered, but the evidence for both was very low.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, DentalAnesthetics, InhalationDental Care for ChildrenAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfantInfant, NewbornMidazolamNitrous OxidePolicyProcedural SedationAnesthetics, InhalationHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamNitrous OxideDentalMidazolamNitrous oxidePaediatricSedation

Identifiers

PMID34453697
PMCPMC8629790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.