Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453675›Full record

Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in routine clinical practice: the RE-COVERY DVT/PE study.

Samuel Z Goldhaber, Walter Ageno, Ivan B Casella, Kok Han Chee, Sebastian Schellong, Daniel E Singer, Isabelle Voccia, Wenbo Tang, Sam Schulman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02596230 (Characterization of Patients Following Acute Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02596230 completednot on this map

Characterization of Patients Following Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Safety and Effectiveness of Dabigatran Etexilate (DE) in the Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in Comparison to Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in Routine Clinical Practice - RE-COVERY DVT/PE

TypeobservationalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2015 to 2019Enrolled7,797ConditionsVenous Thromboembolism
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Samuel Z GoldhaberCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Hardvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. sgoldhaber@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-0448
Walter AgenoUniversity of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Ivan B CasellaSurgery Department, Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kok Han CheeUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sebastian SchellongStadtisches Klinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Daniel E SingerMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Isabelle VocciaBoehringer Ingelheim Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Wenbo TangBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Sam SchulmanThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) · CABoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USSechenov University · RUStädtisches Klinikum Dresden · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RE-COVERY DVT/PE is a two-phase, international, observational study of anticoagulant therapy in patients with deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE). The objective of the second phase was to compare the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran versus a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) over 1 year of follow-up. Primary safety and effectiveness outcomes were major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (MBE/CRNMBEs) and symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (including deaths related to recurrent VTE). To minimize bias due to unbalanced patient characteristics, only patients in an overlapping range of estimated propensity scores were included (analytic set), and propensity score weighting was applied to compare outcomes. Outcome analysis used an as-treated approach, censoring patients after they stopped or switched their initial anticoagulant. Overall, 3009 patients enrolled from 2016 to 2018 were eligible: 60% were diagnosed with DVT alone, 21% with PE alone, and 19% with DVT plus PE. The analytic set consisted of 2969 patients. The incidence rate in %/year (95% confidence interval [CI]) of MBE/CRNMBEs was 2.63 (1.79-3.74) with dabigatran versus 4.48 (3.23-6.06) with warfarin; hazard ratio 0.63 (95% CI 0.32-1.25). For symptomatic recurrent nonfatal or fatal VTE the incidence rate was 1.53 (0.91-2.42) with dabigatran versus 2.01 (1.21-3.14) with VKAs; hazard ratio 0.78 (95% CI 0.30-2.02). In conclusion, we found lower annualized rates of MBE/CRNMBEs with dabigatran than VKA, although the difference was not statistically significant. Annualized rates of symptomatic VTE or related mortality were similar with dabigatran and VKA. These observational results with 1 year of follow-up reflect those of the randomized clinical trials. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02596230, first registered November 4, 2015.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsDabigatranHumansWarfarinAnticoagulantsDabigatranWarfarinAnticoagulationDabigatran etexilateReal-world clinical outcomesVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID34453675
OpenAlexW3194739923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.