Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453595›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021

Effectiveness of different anesthetic methods for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias-Junior, Adriana Pinto Bezerra, Daniela Peressoni Vieira Schuldt, Morgane Marion Kuntze, Graziela de Luca Canto, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Assessment of the effectiveness of intraosseous anaesthesia during restorative procedures on teeth affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation in children.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias-JuniorDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Adriana Pinto BezerraDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Daniela Peressoni Vieira SchuldtDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Morgane Marion KuntzeDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Graziela de Luca CantoDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti GarciaDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil. drlucas.garcia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-0124
Cleonice da Silveira TeixeiraDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Eduardo Antunes BortoluzziDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of anesthetic methods for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, comparing to the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) by meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsStudies were identified from Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to May 2021. Randomized clinical trials comparing the anesthetic success rate of IANB and any other alternative anesthetic method were included. The quality of the selected studies was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effect models were performed to find the pooled estimates of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

resultsTwenty-two studies were selected, which included fourteen anesthetic methods. Two studies were classified as high risk of bias, five as uncertain risk and fifteen as low risk. Vazirani-Akinosi nerve block (VANB) [RR = 1.27; p = 0.007; 95% CI, 1.07-1.52; I

conclusionEvidence suggests that buccal infiltrations associated with IANB, VANB, and IOI are more effective than IANB at anesthetizing posterior mandibular teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Alternative primary methods of anesthesia might be indicated for mandibular posterior teeth presenting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, DentalPulpitisAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansLidocaineMandibular NerveAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineEffectivenessInferior alveolar nerve blockLocal anesthesia. PulpitisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34453595
OpenAlexW3194851256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.