Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453592›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2022

The Possibility of Consensus Regarding Climate Change Adaptation Policies in Agriculture and Forestry among Stakeholder Groups in the Czech Republic.

Miroslav Trnka, Lenka Bartošová, Ioanna Grammatikopoulou, Petr Havlík, Jørgen E Olesen, Petr Hlavinka, Michal V Marek, Davina Vačkářová, Arne Skjelvåg, Zdeněk Žalud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miroslav TrnkaGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic. mirek_trnka@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-8379
Lenka BartošováGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ioanna GrammatikopoulouGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr HavlíkEcosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
Jørgen E OlesenGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr HlavinkaGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal V MarekGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Davina VačkářováGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.
Arne SkjelvågDepartment of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Frederik A. Dahls veg 18, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Zdeněk ŽaludGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As ongoing research efforts contribute to elucidating the consequences of climate change as well as adaptation and mitigation options, aligning the current research knowledge with stakeholder opinions and perceptions remains critical for adopting effective climate change policies. This paper utilizes an interactive survey to (1) address the aforementioned gap in studies involving three groups of stakeholders and opinion makers and (2) perform a comparative primary study of the climate change assumptions, risk perceptions, policy preferences, observations, and knowledge of Czech farmers, governmental policy-makers and researchers. This study shows that the stakeholder groups agree that the climate is clearly changing, attribute this change mostly to man-made causes and expect the negative effects to either prevail or be unevenly geographically distributed. The large majority of all three groups consider unmitigated climate change a major threat even by 2050 and agree that preparing in advance is the best sectoral strategy. Importantly, while investment in adaptation measures is considered the most efficient tool for accelerating the implementation of adaptation measures, the CAP and EU rules (as valid in 2016) are believed to hinder such measures. The results of this study have ramifications for the wider region of Central Europe.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeForestryAgricultureConsensusCzech RepublicHumansPolicyClimate adaptationClimate change impactsClimate policyCluster analysisStakeholder involvement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.