ArticleProteins2021
Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment.
Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- AlphaFold and Docking Approaches for Antibody-Antigen and Other Targets: Insights From CAPRI Rounds 47-55.Proteins · 2026Article
- Biomolecular Interaction Prediction in the Pre- and Post-AlphaFold Era: The 8th CAPRI Evaluation.Proteins · 2026Article
- Massive Sampling Strategy for Antibody-Antigen Targets in CAPRI Round 55 With MassiveFold.Proteins · 2026Article
- Performance of pyDock in 8th CAPRI: Energy-Based Scoring Applied to Docking and AlphaFold Models.Proteins · 2026Article
- Integrative Modeling in the Age of Machine Learning: A Summary of HADDOCK Strategies in CAPRI Rounds 47-55.Proteins · 2026Article
- Multiscale frameworks for exploring protein energy landscapes: advances in theory and simulation.Journal of biological physics · 2026Review
- Accurate protein-protein interactions modeling through physics-informed geometric invariant learning.Communications biology · 2026Article
- A fully automated benchmarking suite to compare macromolecular complexes.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Article
- High-accuracy protein complex structure modeling based on sequence-derived structure complementarity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Boosting AlphaFold protein tertiary structure prediction through MSA engineering and extensive model sampling and ranking in CASP16.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Increasing the fraction of correct solutions in ensembles of protein-protein docking models by an iterative consensus algorithm.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- AlphaFold model quality self-assessment improvement via deep graph learning.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Using Short Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Determine the Important Features of Interactions in Antibody-Protein Complexes.Proteins · 2025Article
- Highly Optimized Simulation of Atomic Resolution Cell-Like Protein Environment.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Decoding Solubility Signatures from Amyloid Monomer Energy Landscapes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Compact Assessment of Molecular Surface Complementarities Enhances Neural Network-Aided Prediction of Key Binding Residues.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
109 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70-75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70-80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.