Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453403›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Patterns and predictors of cancer-specific patient health portal usage among patients with cancer: results from the UWCCC Survivorship Program.

Rebecca P Luoh, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Thevaa Chandereng, Elena M Smith, Cibele B Carroll, Hamid Emamekhoo, Mary E Sesto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of health communication · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca P LuohSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Amye J TevaarwerkSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8087-5119
Thevaa ChanderengUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-9176
Elena M SmithUW Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Cibele B CarrollUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-0928
Hamid EmamekhooSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-8703
Mary E SestoSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520SMPH Shapiro Summer Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPortals can assist patients in managing their healthcare. Understanding how patients with cancer use portals can facilitate improvements in patient engagement in cancer care. This study sought to determine if patients with cancer used portals differently for cancer versus noncancer purposes. The effects of geographic residence (rural vs. urban residence) and cancer stage on portal usage were also investigated.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of portal usage by patients seen at an NCI-designated cancer center between 2015 and 2019. Demographics, cancer characteristics, and portal usage (number of successful logins, messages sent, and results viewed) were extracted. Messages sent and results viewed in the portal were deemed oncologist-specific and cancer specific if sent to or ordered in medical oncology departments, respectively.

resultsThe analysis included a total of 5950 patients with cancer. Patients were less likely to send and view oncologist-specific messages compared to non-oncologist-specific messages. They were also less likely to view cancer results compared to noncancer results. Compared to urban counterparts, patients residing in rural areas had lower odds of having any logins and logged in less frequently during the year of diagnosis. Compared to patients with non-metastatic disease, individuals with metastatic disease were more likely to become frequent portal users.

conclusionsPatients may use portals differently for cancer versus noncancer purposes; urban residence and metastatic cancer were associated with more frequent usage. Further investigation can inform interventions to increase accessibility for groups at a disadvantage related to the use of this technology and to help patients better leverage portals to manage their cancer.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient PortalsRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipcancerelectronic health recordshealth recordspatient portalspersonal

Identifiers

PMID34453403
PMCPMC8525111
OpenAlexW3195849058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.