Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453329›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2022

Soil penetration by maize roots is negatively related to ethylene-induced thickening.

Dorien J Vanhees, Hannah M Schneider, Jagdeep Singh Sidhu, Kenneth W Loades, A Glyn Bengough, Malcolm J Bennett, Bipin K Pandey, Kathleen M Brown, Sacha J Mooney, Jonathan P Lynch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Future roots for future soils.Plant, cell & environment · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  20. Harnessing root architecture to address global challenges.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dorien J VanheesSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.
Hannah M SchneiderDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jagdeep Singh SidhuDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kenneth W LoadesThe James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, UK.
A Glyn BengoughThe James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, UK.
Malcolm J BennettSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.
Bipin K PandeySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.
Kathleen M BrownDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sacha J MooneySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-8113
Jonathan P LynchSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-9790
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBJames Hutton Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radial expansion is a classic response of roots to a mechanical impedance that has generally been assumed to aid penetration. We analysed the response of maize nodal roots to impedance to test the hypothesis that radial expansion is not related to the ability of roots to cross a compacted soil layer. Genotypes varied in their ability to cross the compacted layer, and those with a steeper approach to the compacted layer or less radial expansion in the compacted layer were more likely to cross the layer and achieve greater depth. Root radial expansion was due to cortical cell size expansion, while cortical cell file number remained constant. Genotypes and nodal root classes that exhibited radial expansion in the compacted soil layer generally also thickened in response to exogenous ethylene in hydroponic culture, that is, radial expansion in response to ethylene was correlated with the thickening response to impedance in soil. We propose that ethylene insensitive roots, that is, those that do not thicken and can overcome impedance, have a competitive advantage under mechanically impeded conditions as they can maintain their elongation rates. We suggest that prolonged exposure to ethylene could function as a stop signal for axial root growth.

Indexed as

SoilZea maysEthylenesPlant RootsethyleneEthylenesSoilcell file numbercell sizeethylenemechanical impedanceradial expansionroot anatomyroot axis

Identifiers

PMID34453329
PMCPMC9291135
OpenAlexW3195185716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.