Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453301›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Cross Talk of BDNF and GDNF in Spinal Substantia Gelatinosa (Lamina II): Focus on Circuitry.

Adalberto Merighi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adalberto MerighiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy. adalberto.merighi@unito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BDNF and GDNF display the notable qualities of undergoing a regulated secretion in neurons and being anterogradely transported to nerve terminals, where they can modulate fast synaptic transmission. That BDNF positively modulates nociception and/or pain is today widely accepted, as the growth factor can start and maintain physiological and pathological pain. The contribution of GDNF to nociception is by far most elusive, but evidence is accumulating that the molecule displays analgesic activity, at least in rodents. Here I resume the current knowledge on the spinal cord circuits in which these two factors may act as modulators of pain-related synaptic transmission, focusing on their structural and functional interplay in the regulation of nociception and pain.

Indexed as

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorSubstantia GelatinosaGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorNeuronsSpinal CordSynaptic TransmissionBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBDNFChronic painGDNFNeuropathic painNociceptionSpinal dorsal horn

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.