ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021
Effects of Er:YAG laser treatment on re-vascularization and follicle survival in frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex transplanted to immunodeficient mice.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mechanism and protective strategies of follicle injury after ovarian tissue cryopreservation and thawed transplantation: a review.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Research progress on mechanism of follicle injury after ovarian tissue transplantation and protective strategies.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Effects of needle puncturing on re-vascularization and follicle survival in xenotransplanted human ovarian tissue.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- Hormonal Characteristics of Women Receiving Ovarian Tissue Transplantation with or without Endogenous Ovarian Activity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe huge loss of ovarian follicles after transplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue is considered a major drawback on the efficacy of the procedure. Here we investigate whether Er:YAG laser treatment prior to xenotransplantation can improve re-vascularization and subsequently follicle survival in human ovarian tissue.
methodsA total of 99 frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex pieces were included of which 72 pieces from 12 woman were transplanted to immunodeficient mice. Tissues from each woman were included in both an 8-day and an 8-week duration study and treated with either full-beam laser (L1) or fractionated laser (L2), or served as untreated controls. Vascularization of the ovarian xenografts were evaluated after 8 days by qPCR and murine Cd31 immunohistochemical analysis. Follicle densities were evaluated histologically 8 weeks after xenografting.
resultsGene expression of Vegf/VEGF was upregulated after L1 treatment (p=0.002, p=0.07, respectively), whereas Angpt1, Angpt2, Tnf-α, and Il1-β were significantly downregulated. No change in gene expression was found in Cd31/CD31, ANGPT1, ANGPT2, ANGTPL4, XBP1, or LRG1 after any of the laser treatments. The fraction of Cd31 positive cells were significantly reduced after L1 and L2 treatment (p<0.0001; p=0.0003, respectively), compared to controls. An overall negative effect of laser treatment was detected on follicle density (p=0.03).
conclusionsEr:YAG laser treatment did not improve re-vascularization or follicle survival in human ovarian xenografts after 8 days and 8 weeks grafting, respectively. However, further studies are needed to fully explore the potential angiogenic effects of controlled tissue damage using different intensities or lasers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.