Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453137›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2022

Priority effects in microbiome assembly.

Reena Debray, Robin A Herbert, Alexander L Jaffe, Alexander Crits-Christoph, Mary E Power, Britt Koskella

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 241 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reena Debray *Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. rrdebray@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-4871
Robin A Herbert *Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. rherbert@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9174-1562
Alexander L JaffeDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Alexander Crits-ChristophDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mary E PowerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Britt KoskellaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-8496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in next-generation sequencing have enabled the widespread measurement of microbiome composition across systems and over the course of microbiome assembly. Despite substantial progress in understanding the deterministic drivers of community composition, the role of historical contingency remains poorly understood. The establishment of new species in a community can depend on the order and/or timing of their arrival, a phenomenon known as a priority effect. Here, we review the mechanisms of priority effects and evidence for their importance in microbial communities inhabiting a range of environments, including the mammalian gut, the plant phyllosphere and rhizosphere, soil, freshwaters and oceans. We describe approaches for the direct testing and prediction of priority effects in complex microbial communities and illustrate these with re-analysis of publicly available plant and animal microbiome datasets. Finally, we discuss the shared principles that emerge across study systems, focusing on eco-evolutionary dynamics and the importance of scale. Overall, we argue that predicting when and how current community state impacts the success of newly arriving microbial taxa is crucial for the management of microbiomes to sustain ecological function and host health. We conclude by discussing outstanding conceptual and practical challenges that are faced when measuring priority effects in microbiomes.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal TractMicrobiotaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.