ReviewCancer gene therapy2022
Cutting both ways: the innate immune response to oncolytic virotherapy.
Review in Cancer gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rejuvenating endogenous antitumor immunity via a chimeric receptor-engineered oncolytic virus targeting tumor-associated macrophages.Science advances · 2026Article
- Oncolytic virotherapy with chimeric rVSV-NDV causes tumor-specific immunity in a DC-activation-dependent manner.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Potential for enhanced oncolytic HSV-1 therapy via SHED as a vehicle against malignant gliomas.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Targeting leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 overcomes resistance to oncolytic herpes simplex virus-based therapies in glioblastoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Viruses of avian origin demonstrate potential for cancer virotherapy.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Oncolytic viruses in lung cancer: mechanisms of action and research progress.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Recombinant adenoviruses application for cancer vaccines: from genetic design to clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Alphavirus replicons encoding IFN-γ enhance cancer virotherapy by overcoming macrophage-mediated suppression.iScience · 2025Article
- Neutrophil Dynamics in Response to Cancer Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Viral warfare: unleashing engineered oncolytic viruses to outsmart cancer's defenses.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Molecular Circuits of Immune Sensing and Response to Oncolytic Virotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Neutrophils in oncolytic virus immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Toll-like Receptor Signaling-deficient Cells Enhance Antitumor Activity of Cell-based Immunotherapy by Increasing Tumor Homing.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- A vector-encoded bispecific killer engager to harness virus-activated NK cells as anti-tumor effectors.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Viruses: Friends or foes.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs), above and beyond infecting and lysing malignant cells, interact with the immune system in complex ways that have important therapeutic significance. While investigation into these interactions is still in its early stages, important insights have been made over the past two decades that will help improve the clinical efficacy of OV-based management strategies in cancer care moving forward. The inherent immunosuppression that defines the tumor microenvironment can be modified by OV infection, and the subsequent recruitment and activation of innate immune cells, in particular, is central to this. Indeed, neutrophils, macrophages, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells, as well as other populations such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells, are key to the immune escape that allows tumors to survive, but their natural response to infection can be exploited by virotherapy. While stimulation of innate immune cells by OVs can initiate antitumor responses, related antiviral activity can limit virus spread and direct cytopathogenic effects. In this review, we highlight how each innate immune cell population influences this balance of antitumor and antiviral forces during virotherapy, some of the important molecular pathways that have been identified, and specific therapeutic targets that have emerged through this work. We discuss the importance of OV-based combination therapies in optimizing antiviral and antitumor innate immune responses stimulated by virotherapy toward tumor eradication, and how these processes vary depending on the tumor and OV in question. Rather than concentrating on a particular OV species in the review, we present the range of effects that have been documented across OV types to emphasize the context-specific nature of these interactions and how this is important in the design of future OV-based treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34453122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.