ArticleBMJ open2021
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating co-design approaches with parents in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Pediatrician involvement in communicating positive newborn screening results for Krabbe disease: barriers, facilitators, and ideas for interventions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Perceived severity and parental distress after positive expanded newborn screening: parent-clinician concordance and dyadic processes.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Parental Views on the Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Results Following Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in England.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Design approaches for developing quality checklists in healthcare organizations: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic Newborn Screening Result in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Exploratory Study of the General Practitioner's Perspective.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- An Explorative Qualitative Study of the Role of a Genetic Counsellor to Parents Receiving a Diagnosis After a Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Development of an Online Scenario-Based Tool to Enable Research Participation and Public Engagement in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of parental distress at the communication of positivity at newborn screening for metabolic diseases: an Italian longitudinal study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Expert Perspectives on Pilot and Feasibility Studies: A Delphi Study and Consolidation of Considerations for Behavioral Interventions.Research square · 2023Article
- Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Review
- Parent's Perception of the Types of Support Given to Families with an Infant with Phenylketonuria.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Delivering Positive Newborn Screening Results: Cost Analysis of Existing Practice versus Innovative, Co-Designed Strategies from the ReSPoND Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice.
designA process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory.
settingThree National Health Service provider organisations in England.
participantsTwenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed.
interventionsThree co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions.
resultsAuditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%-76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%-80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice.
conclusionVariations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents' experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15330120.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.