Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452964›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Treatment of hallux rigidus (HARD trial): study protocol of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of arthrodesis versus watchful waiting in the treatment of a painful osteoarthritic first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Mikko Miettinen, Lasse Rämö, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Timo Sirola, Henrik Sandelin, Ville Ponkilainen, Jussi P Repo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04590313 (Treatment of Hallux Rigidus), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04590313 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (HARD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Trial of Arthrodesis Versus Watchful Waiting in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital District of Helsinki and UusimaaRan2021 to 2029Enrolled90ConditionsHallux RigidusArmsArthrodesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikko MiettinenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland mikko.miettinen@hus.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-0060-5360
Lasse RämöDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-8462
Tuomas LähdeojaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-8888
Timo SirolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9287-3882
Henrik SandelinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vaasa Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-4182
Ville PonkilainenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Central Finland, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-4560
Jussi P RepoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4688-5698
University of Helsinki · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHallux rigidus is a common problem of pain and stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) caused mainly by degenerative osteoarthritis. Several operative techniques have been introduced for the treatment of this condition without high-quality evidence comparing surgical to non-surgical care. In this trial, the most common surgical procedure, arthrodesis, will be compared with watchful waiting in the management of hallux rigidus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ninety patients (40 years or older) with symptomatic first MTPJ osteoarthritis will be randomised to arthrodesis or watchful waiting in a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome will be pain during walking, assessed using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 1 year after randomisation. The secondary outcomes will be pain at rest (NRS), physical function (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire), patient satisfaction in terms of the patient-acceptable symptom state, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), activity level (The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports subscale), use of analgesics or orthoses and the rate of complications. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference equal to or greater than the minimal important difference of the primary outcome measure between arthrodesis and watchful waiting. Our primary analysis follows an intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District, Finland. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROTOCOL VERSION: 21 June 2021 V.2.0. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04590313.

Indexed as

Hallux RigidusMetatarsophalangeal JointArthrodesisHumansPainProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWatchful Waitingadult orthopaedicsfoot & anklesurgery

Identifiers

PMID34452964
PMCPMC8404449
OpenAlexW3194421854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.