Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452942›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Codevelopment of COVID-19 infection prevention and control guidelines in lower-middle-income countries: the 'SPRINT' principles.

Victoria Haldane, Savithiri Ratnapalan, Niranjala Perera, Zhitong Zhang, Shiliang Ge, Mia Choi, Lincoln L Lau, Sudath Samaraweera, Warren Dodd, John Walley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victoria HaldaneInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Savithiri RatnapalanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Niranjala PereraDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhitong ZhangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shiliang GeTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mia ChoiInternational Care Ministries Inc, Manila, Philippines.
Lincoln L LauDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7386-4104
Sudath SamaraweeraMinistry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
John WalleyNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Xiaolin WeiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada xiaolin.wei@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has required the rapid development of comprehensive guidelines to direct health service organisation and delivery. However, most guidelines are based on resources found in high-income settings, with fewer examples that can be implemented in resource-constrained settings. This study describes the process of adapting and developing role-specific guidelines for comprehensive COVID-19 infection prevention and control in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsWe used a collaborative autoethnographic approach to explore the process of developing COVID-19 guidelines. In this approach, multiple researchers contributed their reflections, conducted joint analysis through dialogue, reflection and with consideration of experiential knowledge and multidisciplinary perspectives to identify and synthesise enablers, challenges and key lessons learnt.

resultsWe describe the guideline development process in the Philippines and the adaptation process in Sri Lanka. We offer key enablers identified through this work, including flexible leadership that aimed to empower the team to bring their expertise to the process; shared responsibility through equitable ownership; an interdisciplinary team; and collaboration with local experts. We then elaborate on challenges including interpreting other guidelines to the country context; tensions between the ideal compared with the feasible and user-friendly; adapting and updating with evolving information; and coping with pandemic-related challenges. Based on key lessons learnt, we synthesise a novel set of principles for developing guidelines during a public health emergency. The SPRINT principles are grounded in situational awareness, prioritisation and balance, which are responsive to change, created by an interdisciplinary team navigating shared responsibility and transparency.

conclusionsGuideline development during a pandemic requires a robust and time sensitive paradigm. We summarise the learning in the 'SPRINT principles' for adapting guidelines in an epidemic context in LMICs. We emphasise that these principles must be grounded in a collaborative or codesign process and add value to existing national responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDeveloping CountriesHumansPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19hygieneprevention strategiespublic Healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34452942
PMCPMC8406459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.