Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452585›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Practice Patterns and Training Needs Among Physicians Certifying Patients for Medical Marijuana in Florida.

Ruba Sajdeya, Anna Shavers, Jennifer Jean-Jacques, Brianna Costales, Sebastian Jugl, Carly Crump, Yan Wang, Luran Manfio, R Nathan Pipitone, Martha S Rosenthal and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruba SajdeyaUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-3603
Anna ShaversUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jennifer Jean-JacquesUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Brianna CostalesUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sebastian JuglUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Carly CrumpUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yan WangUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Luran ManfioUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
R Nathan PipitoneConsortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA.
Martha S RosenthalConsortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research, FL, USA.
Almut G WintersteinUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Robert L CookUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USFlorida Gulf Coast University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the clinical training or practice experiences among physicians who certify patients for medical marijuana. The objective of this study was to determine information sources, factors influencing recommendations, clinical practices in patient assessment, communications, and recommendations, and priority areas for additional training among physicians who certify patients for medical marijuana.

methodsA cross-sectional state-wide anonymous survey of registered medical marijuana physicians in Florida between June and October 2020 was administered. Numerical responses were quantified using counts and percentages. The frequencies for "often" and "always" responses were aggregated when appropriate.

resultsAmong 116 respondents, the mean (standard deviation) age was 57 (12) years old, and 70% were male. The most frequently used information sources were research articles (n = 102, 95%), followed by online sources (n = 99, 93%), and discussions with other providers and dispensary staff (n = 84, 90%). Safety concerns were most influential in patient recommendations (n = 39, 39%), followed by specific conditions (n = 30, 30%) and patient preferences (n = 26, 30%). Ninety-three physicians (92%) reported they "often" or "always" perform a patient physical exam. Eighty-four (77%) physicians provided specific administration route recommendations. Half (n = 56) "often" or "always" provided specific recommendations for Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol ratios, while 69 (62%) "often" or "always" provided specific dose recommendations. Online learning/training modules were the most preferred future training mode, with 88 (84%) physicians "likely" or "very likely" to participate. The top 3 desired topics for future training were marijuana-drug interactions (n = 84, 72%), management of specific medical conditions or symptoms (n = 83, 72%), and strategies to reduce opioids or other drugs use (n = 78, 67%).

conclusionsThis survey of over 100 medical marijuana physicians indicates that their clinical practices rely on a blend of research and anecdotal information sources. While physicians report clinical factors as influential during patient recommendation, patient assessment practices and treatment regimen recommendations vary substantially and rely on experimental approaches. More research is needed to inform evidence-based practice and training, especially considering details on drug interactions, risk-benefit of treatment for specific clinical conditions, and strategies to reduce opioid use.

Indexed as

Medical MarijuanaPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFloridaHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidMedical Marijuanacannabisclinical practiceguidelinesmedical marijuanaphysician training

Identifiers

PMID34452585
PMCPMC8404623
OpenAlexW3195922044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.