ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2021
Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors Influencing Survival Outcomes of Vulvar Cancer.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor index predicts recurrences of patients with pathological stage Ⅰ gastric cancer after radical surgical resection.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors and Quality of Life in Vulvar Cancer Patients: 12-Year Results from a Eastern European Center.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Controversies in vulvar cancer: revisiting the margin of error.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic factors for survival in squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of vulva cancer such as groin node involvement, postmenopausal status, tumor size, margin status, tumor grade, lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) were reported in the past. However, with limited data from Southeast - Asian population, the present study was conducted to evaluate the clinicopathological prognostic factors for survival outcomes of this disease after treatment with surgery.
methodsAll SCCA vulva cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2006 and December 2017 were reviewed. The clinicopathological factors were analyzed to identify the prognostic factors for the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan- Meier method and Cox-Proportional Hazard model.
resultsOne hundred twenty-five patients were recruited. The independent poor prognostic factors for PFS were groin node-positive and pathologic tumor diameter of more than 25 mm. Whereas postmenopausal status and groin node positive were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.
conclusionGroin node-positive was the only one independent poor prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. In addition, the tumor diameter longer than 25 mm. was independent poor prognostic factors for PFS while postmenopausal status was independent poor prognostic factors for OS. Special adjuvant treatment for patients with these factors should be further investigated. <br />.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.