Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452483›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

Cytomegalovirus Viral Load in Transplanted Patients Using the NeuMoDx™ (Qiagen) Automated System: A 1-Month Experience Feedback.

Léa Luciani, Denis Mongin, Laetitia Ninove, Antoine Nougairède, Kevin Bardy, Céline Gazin, Remi N Charrel, Christine Zandotti

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Léa LucianiUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Université, IRD 190-Inserm 1207, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0738-5957
Denis MonginFaculté de Médecine, Université de Genève, 1205 Genève, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-8395
Laetitia NinoveUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Université, IRD 190-Inserm 1207, 13005 Marseille, France.
Antoine NougairèdeUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Université, IRD 190-Inserm 1207, 13005 Marseille, France.
Kevin BardyLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, IHU Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Céline GazinLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, IHU Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Remi N CharrelUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Université, IRD 190-Inserm 1207, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-8251
Christine ZandottiUnité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Université, IRD 190-Inserm 1207, 13005 Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations represent a significant morbidity and mortality problem in transplant patients. Reliable and rapid measurement of CMV viral load is a key issue for optimal patient management. We report here the evaluation of NeuMoDx™ (Qiagen) in a routine hospital setting (University Hospitals of Marseille, France) in comparison with our classical reference technique R-GENE. During one month, 719 CMV viral loads from 507 patients were measured in parallel in both techniques. Using the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve and our biological experience we suggest that values <52 IU/mL (geometric mean) correspond to negative samples, values >140 IU/mL (Fowlkes-Mallows index) correspond to quantifiable positive results and values ranging from 52 to 140 IU/mL represent non-quantifiable positive results. Follow-up of 15 transplant patients who developed CMV reactivation during the study showed that NeuMoDx™ provided higher viral load measurement during the first two weeks of follow-up for three patients. These important intra-individual variations resulted in a significant median increase considering the whole data set (6.7 points of difference expressed as a percentage of the initial viral load). However, no difference between the two techniques was noticeable after two weeks of treatment. Subsequent to this first study we conclude that NeuMoDx™, used with optimized logistics and an adapted threshold, allows a rapid CMV viral load measurement and that its use does not lead to any difference in patient management compared to the reference technique R-GENE

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralFeedbackFranceHumansLaboratories, ClinicalLatent InfectionProspective StudiesTransplant RecipientsViral LoadDNA, ViralCMVcytomegalovirusNeuMoDxR-GENEviral load

Identifiers

PMID34452483
PMCPMC8402845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.