Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452367›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

BK Polyomavirus-Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis.

Jacek Furmaga, Marek Kowalczyk, Tomasz Zapolski, Olga Furmaga, Leszek Krakowski, Grzegorz Rudzki, Andrzej Jaroszyński, Andrzej Jakubczak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Challenges in the Application of African Swine Fever Vaccines in Asia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacek FurmagaDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery and Nutritional Treatment, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Marek KowalczykInstitute of Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-4468
Tomasz ZapolskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9808-8853
Olga FurmagaDepartment of Radiology, 424 General Military Hospital, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Leszek KrakowskiDepartment and Clinic of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Gleboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8868-5670
Grzegorz RudzkiDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej JaroszyńskiDepartment of Nephrology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-232 Kielce, Poland.
Andrzej JakubczakInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-8349
Medical University of Lublin · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL424 General Military Hospital · GRJan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV), a representative of the family Polyomaviridae, is widespread in the human population. While the virus does not cause significant clinical symptoms in immunocompetent individuals, it is activated in cases of immune deficiency, both pharmacological and pathological. Infection with the BKPyV is of particular importance in recipients of kidney transplants or HSC transplantation, in which it can lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney or to haemorrhagic cystitis, respectively. Four main genotypes of the virus are distinguished on the basis of molecular differentiation. The most common genotype worldwide is genotype I, with a frequency of about 80%, followed by genotype IV (about 15%), while genotypes II and III are isolated only sporadically. The distribution of the molecular variants of the virus is associated with the region of origin. BKPyV subtype Ia is most common in Africa, Ib-1 in Southeast Asia, and Ib-2 in Europe, while Ic is the most common variant in Northeast Asia. The development of molecular methods has enabled significant improvement not only in BKPyV diagnostics, but in monitoring the effectiveness of treatment as well. Amplification of viral DNA from urine by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and qPCR Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a non-invasive method that can be used to confirm the presence of the genetic material of the virus and to determine the viral load. Sequencing techniques together with bioinformatics tools and databases can be used to determine variants of the virus, analyse their circulation in populations, identify relationships between them, and investigate the directions of evolution of the virus.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, ViralAnimalsBK VirusDNA, ViralGenomicsGenotypeImmunocompromised HostKidneyKidney TransplantationMiceOncogenic VirusesPathology, MolecularPolyomavirus InfectionsTransplant RecipientsTumor Virus InfectionsDNA, ViralBK polyomavirusBK polyomavirus subtypesmolecular diagnosticsmolecular polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID34452367
PMCPMC8402805
OpenAlexW3189459906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.