Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452274›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Recent Progress in Drug Release Testing Methods of Biopolymeric Particulate System.

Yejin Kim, Eun Ji Park, Tae Wan Kim, Dong Hee Na

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Supercritical COPolymers · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yejin KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Eun Ji ParkD&D Pharmatech, Seongnam 13486, Korea.
Tae Wan KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Dong Hee NaCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9313-0127
Chung-Ang University · KRPharmaResearch Products (South Korea) · KR

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 21172MFDS702National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1A2B3004266National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1A4A4079817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopolymeric microparticles have been widely used for long-term release formulations of short half-life chemicals or synthetic peptides. Characterization of the drug release from microparticles is important to ensure product quality and desired pharmacological effect. However, there is no official method for long-term release parenteral dosage forms. Much work has been done to develop methods for in vitro drug release testing, generally grouped into three major categories: sample and separate, dialysis membrane, and continuous flow (flow-through cell) methods. In vitro drug release testing also plays an important role in providing insight into the in vivo performance of a product. In vitro release test with in vivo relevance can reduce the cost of conducting in vivo studies and accelerate drug product development. Therefore, investigation of the in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is increasingly becoming an essential part of particulate formulation development. This review summarizes the principles of the in vitro release testing methods of biopolymeric particulate system with the recent research articles and discusses their characteristics including IVIVC, accelerated release testing methods, and stability of encapsulated drugs.

Indexed as

accelerated in vitro release testing methodsbiopolymeric microparticlesdrug release testingin vitro–in vivo correlationpoly(lactide-co-glycolide)

Identifiers

PMID34452274
PMCPMC8399039
OpenAlexW3195761562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.