ArticlePharmaceutics2021
Benefit of a Short Chain Peptide as a Targeting Ligand of Nanocarriers for a Brain-Driven Purpose.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peptide-Engineered Seliciclib Nanomedicine for Brain-Targeted Delivery and Neuroprotection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment of glioma remains a critical challenge worldwide, since the therapeutic effect is greatly hindered by poor transportation across the blood brain barrier (BBB) and low penetration into tumor cells. In this study, a peptide-conjugated nano-delivery system was explored for the purpose of glioma therapy. A peptide-decorated copolymer was used to prepare nanoparticles (NPs) by a solvent evaporation method. The particle size was in the range of 160.9 ± 3.3-173.5 ± 3.6 nm with monodistribution, and the zeta potentials ranged from -18.6 ± 1.2 to +7.9 ± 0.6 mV showing an increasing trend with R9-peptide. An in vitro cocultured BBB model illustrated the internalization of peptide-conjugated NPs in bEnd.3 cells followed by uptake by U87-MG cells indicating both BBB-crossing and glioma-penetrating abilities. IVIS (In Vivo Imaging System) images revealed that T7-conjugated NPs specifically accumulated in the brain more than peptide-free NPs and had less biodistribution in nontarget tissues than T7/R9 dual-peptide conjugated NPs. The benefit of T7-peptide as a targeting ligand for NPs across the BBB with accumulation in the brain was elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.